Pictures of the Day: Egypt and Elsewhere

In order to view this feature, you must download the latest version of flash player here.

#flashHeader{visibility:visible !important;}

Photos from Egypt, Philippines, Lebanon and Democratic Republic of Congo.

Follow Lens on Facebook and Twitter.

The Times Should Have a Reporter at the Bradley Manning Hearing

In failing to send its own reporter to cover the fascinating and important pretrial testimony of Bradley Manning, The New York Times missed the boat.

Over the past several days, as compelling testimony over the harsh treatment of this 24-year-old Army private turned whistle-blower (or illegal informant, depending on your point of view) flooded the media zone, The Times was notably absent.

Accused of giving hundreds of thousands of secret diplomatic cables and classified reports about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the dealings of the United States State Department to WikiLeaks â€" which later released them to the world via its Web site and through news organizations including The Times - Mr. Manning could be sen tenced to life in prison. He has been held as a “maximum custody” detainee at Quantico, Va., for the past nine months, and this hearing is the first time he has given public testimony.

The Times has not ignored the event entirely â€" it published one story on the subject, a brief piece from The Associated Press, on Friday. But it has not sent a staff reporter â€" the national security reporters Scott Shane or Charlie Savage would have been great choices, but certainly not the only ones â€" to the hearing at Fort Meade, Md.

Why?

David Leonhardt, the Washington bureau chief, explained in an e-mail that, in essence, The Times did not think the hearing itself demanded coverage.

We've covered him and will continue to do so. But as with any other legal case, we won't cover every single proceed ing. In this case, doing so would have involved multiple days of a reporter's time, for a relatively straightforward story. The A.P. article recounting the main points of Mr. Manning's testimony about his conditions of confinement that ran on page A3 of The Times conveyed fundamentally the same material as a staff story would have. And Charlie Savage covered his conditions of confinement, as they were being debated, in two previous articles: http://goo.gl/dvFV0, http://goo.gl/gYTX7.

Again, though, readers can definitely expect more coverage of Mr. Manning in the weeks to come.

The New Republic's Eliza Gray bashes The Times in her piece on Wednesday, and a Times reader, David Morf â€" one of many readers who wrote to me a bout this - was highly critical. He wrote, in part:

The N.Y. Times is the paper of record that published and stood behind the Penagon Papers. Where are you now on the brutal prison treatment and studied legalities being visited on U.S. Army Private Bradley Manning? All he did was reveal to us what the rest of the world actually experiences of us as an actor-in-fact whenever we apparently feel we can get away with it.

Mr. Obama has run a long, low, and mean campaign when it comes to prosecuting the exposure of wrongful behavior by U.S. operatives.

I voted for him as a decent voice of liberal value in a world where the lights are going out, and this is what we get - Private Manning naked in chains? Is this the behavior the U.S. chooses to condone, while posturing itself as the home of the free and the brave?

I do not really understand Mr. Obama's silence and prosecutions. I truly do not understand your silence. It's bad enough that Pr ivate Manning has been badly maltreated for revealing truth to power.

It's unconscionable and sad if The Times sits quietly by saying nothing - even worse, simply running AP wire copy to let the story bury itself.

One doesn't have to agree with either of those viewpoints or interpretations of events to see the news value of the Manning testimony at Fort Meade. The testimony is dramatic and the overarching issues are important.

The Times should be there.

Images of Independence, Finally Free

In order to view this feature, you must download the latest version of flash player here.

#flashHeader{visibility:visible !important;}

The photographs were shockingly graphic, detailing the torture and execution of men suspected of collaborating with pro-Pakistani militias during Bangladesh's 1971 war for independence. Featured on front pages and magazine c overs around the world, they provoked outrage and won awards, including World Press Photo and a Pulitzer - both shared by Horst Faas and Michel Laurent.

Only three Western photographers were on the scene of the executions: Mr. Faas, Mr. Laurent and Christian Simonpietri. The Magnum photographer Marc Riboud left the scene minutes before and later said he did so because his presence was only encouraging the brutality.

But there was another photojournalist there, whom the others didn't know: Rashid Talukder, who worked for a Ba ngladeshi newspaper. Though he also made dramatic images, he did not publish them. He couldn't. Mr. Talukder knew that - unlike the foreign photographers - he would not leave Bangladesh and dash to the next overseas hot spot. He would be staying. And the men behind the executions were among the most powerful in the country.

Instead, he kept the images to himself for more than 20 years.

“Rashid publishing this picture would have been equivalent to him signing his own death warrant,” said Shahidul Alam, founder of the Drik Picture Agency in Dhaka.

Mr. Talukder's photo (Slide 2) remained stashed away until 1993 when Mr. Alam convinced him that there was no longer extreme danger in publishing the images in Bangladesh. It was published in The Daily Star along with an article by Mr. Alam. They were later exhibited publicly by Mr. Alam in Dhaka in 2000.

Whi le Mr. Talukder is virtually unknown outside of Bangladesh, he was one of the foremost chroniclers of the struggle for independence, photographing its origins in the language movement of the 1950s and continuing through the war's aftermath.

Now hailed as a founding father of Bangladeshi photography, Mr. Talukder made some of the most important images of the war, which by some estimates claimed one million lives and turned 10 million of his countrymen into refugees. He also documented everyday life in Bangladesh during his 46-year career, during which he worked for the newspapers The Daily Sangbad and The Daily Ittefaq.

A self-taught photographer with a strong sense of humor, he received a Lifetime Achievement Award at the Chobi Mela international photography festival in Dhaka, in 2006.

When Mr. Talukder died in October of last year, at the age of 72, Mr. Alam described him as “quick-witted, fast on his feet, streetwise, gregarious, loud and completely disarming.”

At times it was hazardous being a photojournalist in Bangladesh, both before and after independence. There have been many military coups and little freedom of the press. Mr. Talukder himself was once beaten severely by a police officer - a man whom he recalled having rescued from an angry mob a few years earlier.

When he was shooting news with his medium-format Rolleiflex, he was looking down into the camera and getting quite close to his subjects - even in volatile situations. His pictures are direct, simple and often quite raw.

“He was working right in the middle of things because he had to be,” Mr. Alam said. “There wasn't any security. And for many of the pictures, he was right in the thick of the conflict. He got injured several times.”

Mr. Alam and his colleagues at Drik are trying to restore Mr. Talukder's a rchives, sorting through negatives that were mostly stored in garbage bags in no specific order. Decades of exposure to Dhaka's humidity and monsoons have badly deteriorated some of the negatives and prints.

To mark the 40th anniversary of the war for independence, Mr. Alam, with the help of Robert Pledge of Contact Press Images,  published an award-winning book of photographs from the 1971 conflict, “The Birth Pangs of a Nation.”  Financed by the United Nations, it features many of the finest photographers of the time: Donald McCullin, Mary Ellen Mark, Bruno Barbey, David Burnett, Abbas as well as Mr. Haas, Mr. Laurent and Mr. Riboud.

Amid that celebrated group is one more name: Rashid Talukder.

Rashid Talukder/Drik A turtle crossed a road.

Follow @JamesEstrin and @nytimesphoto on Twitter. Lens is also on Facebook.