Photos from Egypt, Mali, Brazil and Saudi Arabia.
Follow Lens on Facebook and Twitter.
|
Total Pageviews |
Lynsey Addario, a photographer for The New York Times, has extensively covered the war in Afghanistan, often focusing on female soldiers. She spoke with James Estrin about the Pentagonâs recent lifting of the ban on women i combat. The conversation, which took place via Skype from her home in London has been edited.
When I heard about the lifting of the ban on women in combat, I thought about your coverage of female soldiers for The Times, and also about the interview we did about women covering conflict after you were freed from captivity in Libya. What was your reaction to the announcement
It is a huge step historically, of course, but itâs actually just stating publicly what has been happening little by little over the past decade. Women have been fighting this war more and more, whether we acknowledge it or not.
Theyâre at bases all across Afghanistan, and theyâre playing different roles - from black ops pilots to doing triage in forward-oper! ating medical centers. Theyâre engaging women in villages of Helmand that are covered with landmines. They are getting shot at. They are dying, and they are getting injured.
Everyone can fight about whether women should be on the front lines, but the fact is that they are out there. So, at some point, you have to acknowledge it and compensate them for it or at least give them the dignity of saying âO.K., youâre out there, and thank you for it.â Instead of saying, âNo, theyâre not allowed,â but really, they are.
Youâve often focused on female soldiers.
Mostly in 2009 and 2010. Most of the work I shot on assignment for The New York Times when I was doing a series with Elisabeth Bumiller. And then when I was doing the big National Geographic story on wmen in Afghanistan, I did a few embeds focusing on female soldiers who would meet Afghan women. That work is so dear to me, and I loved shooting it.
Who are these women joining the military and wanting to be in combat
Theyâre women who donât feel inhibited by their sex, by their gender. I mean, theyâre women who donât feel limited by the fact that they were born women. They believe in fighting for their country. They want to be doing something to help fight the wars that weâve been fighting for over a decade. And they want to be out there.
Theyâre no different than any of us. They have a goal, and they want to accomplish it. And they donât want to be told they canât do it because theyâre women.
A lot of them are extremely ambitious, very dedicated. They work out all the time, very intelligent.
What made you want to do this story to pursue it so deeply
One of the biggest challenges as a photographer is to take a subject thatâs been covered for decades and to try to bring something new to it. Iâve been going on these embeds for years, and itâs very hard to make a compelling picture or something new that the reader hasnât seen before.
When I started seeing women on the front line, I was intrigued. It felt so strange to me, and I immediately got pulled in. I also had access to them because I was often put in the same tent or made to sleep in the room with all the women. I was always sort of pushed off with the women because on militarybases, thereâs a real separation. You know, you have to have separate sleeping quarters for women.
What is that you learned as you pursued this story
I think the longer these wars go on, and the more women are inserted in these nontraditional roles in the military, the more we have to accept the fact that there are actually women on the front lines.
I myself am a woman, and Iâve been embedding for years with the military. And granted, Iâm not carrying thousands of rounds of ammunition and the packs that they carry. But I do go on the same patrols that the men go on and I am able to keep up.
There are great differences between men and women in terms of strength and what we can carry and what we can keep up with, but I donât think itâs necessary for men and women to be equal. I think that women can play a role on the front line without having to hold up the same amount of weight as men.
Yo! u said that you donât have to look at men and women as being equal for women to contribute on the front line. What exactly did you mean
Well, I think one of the arguments a lot of people have is that women canât hold their own the way men can. For example, if you have a fellow soldier whoâs been shot, can you carry his body alone back to a safe place And one of the arguments is that a woman couldnât do that. So therefore, she shouldnât be out there.
I donât know how you work around that. Iâm not really sure what the answer is. The fact is that women are not as strong as a lot of men. There are some women who are, but I think, over all, itâs going to be a challenge to find women who can keep up with the physical endurance tests that men can. That said, Iâm not sure how important that is anymore because the war is changing. The war we fight now is not the same war that was fought 40 years ago.
This is a war on terror, this is a war where the front lines are nebulous.
When we talked about your being on the front lines shortly after you were freed from Libya, you pointed to specific things you thought a woman could bring to the table. A woman may not have the same access to men, but theyâre going to have much stronger access to women. And different perspectives. Is there a similar situation for female soldiers on the front line
This gets back into the discussion about what is the front line. The female engagement teams were created to engage with Afghan women â! " 50 perc! ent of the population â" that we didnât have access to before. Thatâs part of the whole counterinsurgency project. So, if youâre trying to win over a population and you donât have access to 50 percent of the people, itâs going to be very hard.
You canât do that with men because, traditionally in Afghanistan, men cannot go into a house and sit down with Afghan women. The female engagement teams went in, and they were able to sit down, drink tea and talk to Afghan women.
How much was accomplished is obviously up for discussion. Some people say not that much was accomplished and that they just went and drank tea. Some people say, âWell, they were able to gain trust of families that didnât before believe that Americans were good people.â
If your doctrine is counterinsurgency, if youâre trying to win over the population, itâs probably worth the effort to go out and try to engage in a country thatâs very segregated by the sexes.
Iâm oder than you, and I remember when there werenât many women in the military. And there were heated discussions about how women canât be in the military, how women canât be captured, how it would harm the other soldiers and it would hurt morale.
Well, I remember when Elizabeth Rubin and I went to the Korengal Valley to embed with the 173rd Airborne. This was for The New York Times Magazine. And Elizabeth wanted to do a story about why, with all the firepower that we had, we werenât winning the war And how come there was so much collateral damage And so basically, we lived on the side of a mountain for two months of the Korengal Outpost.
But when we first asked the press guys with the military to go to that base, they said, âIt is not a place fit for women. You cannot go.â And Elizabeth and I said thatâs exactly where we want to go. Now we really want to go.
And s! o finally, we fought so much that they sent us to the Korengal, and we were the only two women there for months. This was before the female engagement teams, and that particular outpost saw heavy fighting all the time. I mean, we were basically shot at or mortared almost on a daily basis.
We kept up with all the patrols. We went on six, seven hour a day patrols. We carried our own stuff. We were out there getting shot at as well. Now, were we carrying guns and ammunition No. So itâs a very different thing. But we were able to keep up and we were able to live out there.
I think when you start challenging the norms and when you star pushing the boundaries a little, you realize that the boundaries can really be pushed.
Is there anything that you can think of that is a realistic boundary between male and female soldiers
Yes. I mean, there are times where you need someone who can carry the soldier if he gets shot. Or you need someone who physically can carry a certain amount of rounds of ammunition. Iâm not a commander in the military, so thereâs a lot I donât understand.
There are situations where women arenât really fit to be in certain roles. Special Forces, for example. Do I think women can be in Special Forces Iâm not sure. The demand on the body and spending extended periods of time in the middle of nowhere, I donât know if thatâs O.K. for women.
But I do think there is space for women on the front lines, but it is always going to be defined by what exactly is that front line. Because itâs not Vietnam, weâre in a very different ! war. Â It! âs different from 30 years ago, or 20 years ago.
Is the situation of a female foreign correspondent or photojournalist on the front lines similar to that of female soldiers
Itâs different, because the military has layers and layers and layers of command. And so they take decisions as a group.
You know, when youâre dealing with the military, those are decisions that are made at a very high level and passed down. Me, Iâm in charge of my own destiny. So I can decide, to a certain extent, how much I want to be in the middle of combat.
One time, we were shot at as I was walking around with one of the female engagement teams. Just because legally, they werenât allowed to be on the front lines, they were still being shot at on the front lines.
Follow Lens on Facebook and Twitter.