A federal prosecutor in Brazil is seeking a court order to force the country's central bank to replace the nation's entire supply of paper currency with bills that do not display the phrase âGod Be Praised,â the newspaper Folha de São Paulo reported on Monday.
The prosecutor, Jefferson Aparecido Dias, whose office defends the rights of citizens in the city of São Paulo, said that he had received a complaint last year about the use of the phrase. He argued in a 17-page motion filed on Monday that the words âDeus Seja Louvado,â which have ap peared on notes of the Brazilian real since 1986, violate the rights of non-Christians and non-believers.
Although he acknowledged that most Brazilians are Christian, the prosecutor wrote, âthe Brazilian state is secular and, as such, should be completely detached from any religious manifestation.â To make his case that the phrase was inappropriate, he asked the court to consider the reaction of Christians if the nation's currency included calls to worship figures revered by Muslims, Buddhists, observers of Candomblé or Hindus - or a statement endorsing atheism. âLet's imagine if the real note had any of these phrases on it: âPraise Allah,' âPraise Buddha,' âHail Oxossi,' âHail Lord Ganesh,' or âGod does not exist.'â
Writing on Twitter, the Archbishop of São Paulo, Cardinal Odilo Scherer, wondered if anyone even noticed the phrase, which is rendered in tiny letters on the notes.
Você já percebeu que as notas Real tem uma rederência a Deus? Há alguém querendo tirar. Que v. Acha?
- Dom Odilo Scherer (@DomOdiloScherer) 12 Nov 12
The cardinal also said in a statement, âThe phrase should make no difference to those who do not believe in God. But it is meaningful for all those who do believe in God. And those who believe in God also pay taxes and are most of the population.â
Brazil's central bank had previously replied to the complaint by arguing that the religious reference was valid because the preamble to the Brazilian constitution explicitly states that the democracy was formed âunder the protection of God.â The bank's response to the prosecutor added that the state, ânot being atheist, anti-clerical or anti-religious, can legitimately make a reference to the existence of a higher being, a divinity, as long as, in doing so, it does not make an allusion to a specific religious doctrine.â