I wrote Monday about The Times's relatively low-key approach to covering the Iraq war's 10th anniversary, contrasting it to more robust efforts in The Guardian and to its own efforts on the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Here are some further pieces that have appeared in The Times and elsewhere about the war.
* Room for Debate in the Opinion section is raising the question of whether the United States is better off after toppling Saddam Hussein.
* An article in the International section of Tuesday's Times notes the “anniversary many Iraqis would prefer to ignore.â€
* Erik Wemple's blog in The Washington Post previews a CNN piece that will discuss the skeptical reporting offered by two Knight-Ridder Washington bureau reporters, Jonathan Landay and Warren Strobel, in the run-up to the war.
* George Packer, in The New Yorker's Daily Comment Blog, writes about a photojournalism exhibition chronicling the war in Iraq.
* Michael Calderone in the Huffington Post says the news media failure leading up to the Iraq war could happen again.
*Chief Washington correspondent David Sanger offers news analysis on the lessons of the Iraq war for today's decision-makers.
*An editorial in Wednesday's Times assesses the war, calling it “unnecessary, costly and damaging on every level.â€
*Shreeya Sinha produced this multimedia timeline of how The Times covered the early days of the war.
*An article on Wednesday's front page by Tim Arango and Michael R. Gordon described sectarian tensions that threaten stability in Iraq today.
*Several letters to the editor in Thursday's paper reflect on Iraq, a decade later.
